TAG | unauthorized trades
26
Doug Mirabelli, Ex-Red Sox backstop, Wins $1.2M in Damages from Merrill
Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA
In a January 25th., 2012, article from InvestmentNews.com, the staff writes that Former Boston Red Sox catcher and two-time World Series winner Doug Mirabelli, who made a nice career of being the preferred backstop to knuckleballer Tim Wakefield, finally saw a pitch even he couldn’t handle.
In March 2008, the same month he was released by the Red Sox, Mirabelli and his wife invested $880,219 with Bank of America Merrill Lynch adviser Phil Scott and took out loans that brought their account value to $1.8 million, according to an article in The New York Times. Scott put the money into the Merrill Lynch Phil Scott Team Income Portfolios, a bundle of 33 dividend-paying growth stocks. The loans were made on the condition that the account not dip below $1 million.
The InvestmentNews.com article goes on to say that by November, the Mirabellis’ account had dropped below that level, and they liquidated it to cover the loans. The Mirabellis argued in arbitration that Scott had put his client’s money into unsuitable, all-growth-stock investments and improperly briefed the couple on the loans and their requirements.
This arbitration panel ruled in favor of the Mirabellis and awarded them $1.2 million to cover their initial investment, plus all legal fees and arbitration costs. This was the second defeat for Scott in the last 12 months, according to The New York Times article. Merrill has moved to vacate the previous award and it’s unclear if they will do the same with Mirabelli’s.
“We disagree with the panel’s decision given the facts presented in this case,” said Bill Halldin, a spokesman for Merrill. “This account was handled properly during a very difficult time when there was extreme market volatility.”
Doug Mirabelli, 41, earned roughly $7 million over a dozen seasons. He now works as a real estate agent in Michigan.
Bank of America Merrill Lynch losses · broker discipline · broker misleading customers · Doug Mirabelli wins claim from Merrill · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · improperly briefing clients by brokers on products · investment fraud · Lars Soreide · Merrill adviser Phil Scot · Merrill Lynch · Merrill Lynch broker losses arbitration · Merrill Lynch Pil Scott Team Income Portfolios · Phil Scott broker to Doug Mirbelli · securities fraud lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock broker fraud · stock loss · stockbroker misconduct · unauthorized trades · unsuitable all growth stock investments · unsuitable investments · Unsupervised activity of brokers
5
Finra files complaint against David Lerner Associates For REIT Sales to Elderly
Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA
In a June, 2011, article from Bloomberg News, it was written that David Lerner Associates Inc. has been accused of targeting unsophisticated and elderly customers while selling real estate investment trust (REITs) shares without considering whether the illiquid security was suitable for its clients.
David Lerner Associates is based in Syosset, New York, and known for its “Take a tip from Poppy” advertising slogan, misled investors who bought more than $300 million of shares in the $2 billion Apple REIT Ten offering this year, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority(FINRA) said in a disciplinary complaint on its website. The firm denies the allegations, according to a statement.
It was reported in the Bloomberg News article that David Lerner Associates solicited customers for Apple REIT Ten, it provided misleading information about distribution rates for a series of predecessor securities that are now closed to investors, Finra said. The figures failed to show that distributions far exceeded income and were funded by debt that increased leverage in the REITs, which invest in extended-stay hotels, the regulator said. David Lerner Associates has sold almost $6.8 billion of Apple REIT shares to more than 122,000 customers since 1992, according to the Finra complaint, the industry-funded regulator for U.S. brokerages. Those sales have generated more than $600 million, accounting for more than 60 percent of the firm’s business since 1996, Finra said.
This complaint is the first step in a formal proceeding, Finra said. It isn’t filed in court, and the firm can request a hearing before a disciplinary panel, the regulator said in its statement.
“The firm conducted thorough due diligence of Apple REIT Ten’s offering documents and audited financial statements,” DLA said in its statement. “DLA will vigorously defend these claims. It looks forward to the opportunity to set the record straight and expects to be completely vindicated.”
Also, in the Bloomberg News article it was stated that in September, DLA paid a $255,000 fine for failing to provide required information in connection with the replacement of variable life insurance policies and annuity contracts from November 1998 through February 2004, according to the New York State Insurance Department. A year ago this month, DLA was accused by Finra of overcharging customers on sales of municipal bonds and mortgage securities. That case is still pending, according to Finra’s brokerage records.
If you or a family member have become a victim of the alleged fraudulent schemes of David Lerner Associates, Inc., call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how you could potentially recover you losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
annuity contracts · Apple REIT ten · Apple REIT X · brokers involved in elder abuse · David Lerner Associates Inc · elder abuse · elder abuse awareness · elder abuse in investments · extended stay hotel REITs · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · insurance fraud · insurance fraud lawyer · investment fraud · Lerner sale of REITs · life insurance lawyer · life insurance policies · overcharging clients by brokers · overcharging customers on sales of municipal bonds · overcharging on mortgage securities · projected returns for life insurance policies · Real Estate Investment Trust · REIT · sale of REITs to elderly · Sale of unsuitable REITS · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud · securities fraud lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · stock loss · stockbroker misconduct · Take a tip from Poppy · targeting elderly investors · Tip from Poppy ads · unauthorized trades · unsuitable REITs for elderly clients · viatical fraud · viatical settlement
elder abuse in investments · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · fraud · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · investment fraud · Joseph Jocoby · Joseph Louis Jacoby · Josephy Jacoby Legend Securities · Legend Securities Inc · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · stock loss · stockbroker misconduct · targeting elderly investors · unauthorized trades
28
Multiple Chinese Companies Listed on U.S. Stock Exchanges Shut Down by SEC
Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA
Throughout 2010, the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) began an investigation into Chinese companies in the United States that became public through a process called “reverse mergers.” The term, reverse merger, is also referred to as a reverse takeover or RTO. In an RTO, a Chinese company is acquired by an American “shell” company. An American shell company is a company which already has stock trading in the U.S., but the company does not operate a business or own assets. These Chinese companis merge into the shell. Through this process, the Chinese company can be brought public without the regulatory scrutiny of the Initial Public Offering (IPO) process in the United Sates.
On February 1, 2011, the SEC charged eight individuals and three RTO companies – China Digital, Global Peopleline and m-Wise – in a $33 million fraud. The SEC alleges that defendants engaged in schemes to pump up the price and trading volume then dumped (sold) millions of shares of these securities into the market making millions of dollars in profits, leaving unsuspecting investors with shares worth next to nothing. Other such examples include China Energy Savings Technology, Fuwei Films, and China Water and Drinks.
The U.S. exchange trade officials have halted the trading of four Chinese companies brought public by WestPark Capital of California. WestPark brought the following four Chinese based companies public: NIVS IntelliMedia (NIV), China Intelligent Lighting and Electronics (CIL), China Century Dragon Media (CDM), and China Electric Motor (CELM). Allegedly to inflate their income statements and assets on their balance sheets.
If you or a family member have lost money in a Chinese company stock listed on a U.S. stock exchange call Soreide Law Group, PLLC, for a free consultation about potentially recovering your investment losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
broker theft from customers · CDM · CELM · china century dragon media · China Digital · china electric motor · China Energy Savings Technology · china intelligent lighting and electronics · China Water and Drinks · Chinese companies · chinese companies investigated by SEC · chinese companies shell american companies · Chinese Company pump and dump · Chinese Corportations · Chinese stock de-listed · Chinese Stock Losses · CIL · elder abuse · elder abuse awareness · elder abuse in investments · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · Fuwei Films · Global Peopleline · investment fraud · IPO · lawsuits against Chinese Stock · m-Wise · Misrepresentation Chinese Stock · NIV · nivs intellimedia · pump and dump · reverse mergers · reverse takeover · RTO · SEC · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · Stock fraud lawyer · stock loss · stockbroker misconduct · targeting elderly investors · unauthorized trades · WestPark Capital
avoiding ponzi schemes · bernie maddoff losses · elder abuse · elder abuse awareness · elder abuse in investments · feeder hedge fund losses · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · Firfield Greenwich morgan keegan losses · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · fraud · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · hedge fund losses · hedge fund ponzi schemes · hedge fund scams · investment fraud · Lieberman award by FINRA · Maddoff awards · Maddoff feeder fund award · maddofff ponzi · Madoff Ponzi Scheme · manipulating hedge fund · morgan keegan lawsuits · morgan keegan maddoff losses · Ponzi scheme · ponzi scheme losses · recovering Maddoff losses · securities arbitration · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · stock loss · stockbroker misconduct · targeting elderly investors · unauthorized trades
Alvin Waino Gebhart Jr. (CRD #1005905, Registered Principal, Fallbrook, California) and Donna Traina Gebhart (CRD #2708528, Registered Principal, Fallbrook, California).
On the FINRA website, it was reported that Alvin Gebhart was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Donna Gebhart was fined $15,000, suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for one year, and must requalify by exam in all capacities. The Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition following the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s denial of petition for review. The SEC had previously sustained the NAC decision.
The sanctions were based on findings that Alvin and Donna Gebhart engaged in private securities transactions without prior written notification to, or prior approval from, their member firm. The findings stated that Alvin and Donna Gebhart sold unregistered securities that were not exempt from registration, and recklessly made material misrepresentations and omissions in connection with the sale of securities.
Donna Gebhart’s suspension is in effect from June 7, 2010, through June 6, 2011. (FINRA Case #C0220020057)
If you have become a victim of the alleged fraudulent schemes of Alvin Waino Gebhart, Jr., or Donna Taina Gebhart, call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how you could potentially recover you losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Alvin Gebhart · Alvin Waino Gebhart Jr · broker selling unregistered securities · Donna Gebhart · Donna Taina Gebhart · elder abuse in investments · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · fraud by broker selling securities · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · Gebhart · investment fraud · no approval from customer by broker · private securities transaction · private securities transactions without written notification · securities arbitration · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud · securities fraud lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · stock loss · stockbroker misconduct · targeting elderly investors · unauthorized trades · unregistered securities · unregistered security
6
Joey Wade Dean, Hot Springs, Arkansas, Barred by FINRA
Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA
Joey Wade Dean (CRD #3061136, Registered Representative, Hot Springs, Arkansas)
was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. The sanction was based on findings that Dean willfully made material misrepresentations and omissions to customers that were either intentional or reckless in connection with the purchase of securities.
The findings stated that Dean sold the customers unsecured firm debts and
misrepresented that their principal was protected and falsely guaranteed the customers a rate of return.
The findings also stated that Dean executed unauthorized sales of shares of the securities from customers’ accounts. The findings also included that Dean
recommended and effected unsuitable transactions in customers’ accounts because of
the extraordinary concentration of a single issuer’s securities in the customers’ accounts.
(FINRA Case #2008012833801)
This information was obtained on FINRA’s website.
If you have become a victim of these alleged fraudulent schemes of Joey Wade Dean, call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how you could potentially recover you losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
auction rate securities · broker guaranteeing rate of return · elder abuse in investments · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · investment fraud · Joey Dean · Joey Wade Dean · securities · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud · securities fraud lawyer · single issuer securities in customers accounts · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · stock loss · stockbroker misconduct · targeting elderly investors · unauthorized sales of securities from customers accounts · unauthorized trades · unsecured firm debts
Daniel A. Contreras (CRD #4151950, Registered Principal, Ontario, California) submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or denying the findings, Contreras consented to the described sanction and to the entry of findings that he engaged in private securities transactions by recommending that customers invest in promissory notes, which were not approved investments of his member firm.
The FINRA findings stated that Contreras failed to provide written notice to his firm describing in detail the proposed transactions and his proposed role therein, and stating whether he had received, or might receive, selling compensation in connection with the transactions.
The findings also stated that the company that issued the promissory notes filed for Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, and all of Contreras’ customers lost their entire investment. The findings also included that Contreras borrowed approximately $65,000 from his customers, contrary to his firm’s written procedures prohibiting registered representatives from borrowing money or securities from any prospects or customers, including non-firm prospects/customers, and Contreras failed to pay back the money he borrowed.
This information was obtained on FINRA’s website.
If you have been a victim of these alleged fraudulent schemes of Daniel A. Contreras, call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how to recover your losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
broker borrowing money from customer · broker taking personal loans from customers · broker theft · broker theft from customers · Daniel A Contreras · Daniel Contreras · elder abuse · elder abuse awareness · elder abuse in investments · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra securities arbitration · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · investment fraud · promissory note fraud · promissory notes · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · stock loss · stockbroker misconduct · sue my stockbroker · targeting elderly investors · unauthorized trades
5
Thomas Anthony Chrestman Fined and Suspended by FINRA
Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA
Thomas Anthony Chrestman (CRD #1135841, Registered Representative, Cordova, Tennessee) submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was fined $20,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for three months. Without admitting or denying the findings, Chrestman consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of findings that he engaged in pre-arranged trading of collateralized mortgage obligation (CMO) bonds in a trading account of his member firm.
The findings stated that Chrestman effected CMO bond transactions in the firm’s trading account for which a registered principal/trader or another trader, whose transactions the principal also coordinated, was the contra-party. The findings also stated that the transactions were pre-arranged and directed by the registered principal, who set the price of the bonds and, simultaneously, agreed to repurchase them from Chrestman at a specified time, at an agreed-upon price that provided Chrestman with a profit. The findings also included that Chrestman participated in the pre-arranged trading with the registered principal because the principal asked that he do so; Chrestman was not familiar with all of the risks and attributes of the “inverse floater” CMOs that he was trading with the principal, and did not ascertain whether the transaction prices were at or away from the current market.
FINRA found that the registered principal consistently repurchased, or caused the
repurchase of, the bonds within a short time after Chrestman acquired them, the
transactions were not without risk and an increasing number of the transactions occurred at prices away from the current independent market. FINRA also found that had the principal failed to repurchase those CMO bonds, the firm’s trading account would have owned them at a price exceeding the price the firm was likely to obtain in an open-market sell transaction.
The suspension is in effect from March 21, 2011, through June 20, 2011. (FINRA Case
#2008012444204).
This information was obtained on FINRA’s website.
If you feel you have been a victim of these alleged fraudulent schemes of Thomas Anthony Chrestman, call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how to recover your losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
broker as contra-party · broker pre-arranging prices · broker repurchasing bonds · broker theft from customers · CMO · cmo bonds · Collateralized Mortgage Obligations · contra-party · elder abuse · elder abuse in investments · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · fraud · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · inverse floater · inverse floating rate CMOs · investment fraud · phony trades in CMOs · prearranged trading · repurchase of bonds by brokers · risky CMO investments · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud · securities fraud lawyer · sham CMOs · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · stock loss · stockbroker misconduct · targeting elderly investors · Thomas Anthony Chrestman · Thomas Chrestman · unauthorized trades
2
Final Judgement Entered Against Anthony Fareri and Fareri Financial Services for Defrauding Customers for More than $4.7mill.
Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA
It was announced on the SEC’s website that on February 28, 2011, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida entered judgments by default against defendants Anthony Fareri, Fareri Financial Services d/b/a Amerifinancial, and Relief Defendant Anthony Fareri & Associates, Inc. The district court’s order enjoins Fareri and Fareri Financial Services from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The order also enjoins defendant Fareri Financial Services, a broker-dealer controlled by Fareri, from violating Section 15(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act. As part of the court’s judgment, Fareri is subject to a disgorgement order requiring him to pay either individually or jointly-and-severally a combined total of $1,840,703 plus prejudgment interest of $667,031.73 for a grand total of $2,507,734.73. Under the order, Fareri Financial Services is jointly and severally liable for $160,703.74 of the disgorgement and Anthony Fareri & Associates is jointly and severally liable for $820,000 in disgorgement plus prejudgment interest of $297,150.61 for a total of $1,117,150.61.
It was also announced that the district court imposed a civil penalty in the amount of $100,000 on Fareri and permanently barred him from participating in the offering of penny stocks.
In its complaint against the defendants, the SEC alleged that in 2004 and 2005:
*Fareri defrauded his customers of more than $4.7 million by purchasing and otherwise acquiring for their accounts worthless shares of two shell companies as part of a fraudulent scheme to manipulate the companies’ stock.
*Fareri worked together with a Florida investor, Paul Harary, to create an artificial market for the two stocks. Fareri created the demand for the stocks by purchasing them for FFS’s customers. Harary controlled the supply of the unrestricted shares and sold them.
*Fareri and Harary manipulated the price of the two stocks using pre-arranged matched orders to move up the price and to create the illusion of market demand.
*As part of the scheme, Fareri received kickbacks totaling more than $1 million. He also received more than $160,000 in commissions and/or markups
*Fareri’s defrauded customers included retirees who had limited investment experience and relied exclusively on Fareri to invest their money in accordance with their conservative risk tolerance and investment objectives.
The SEC article goes on to say that according to the complaint, the two shell companies were Secure Solutions Holdings, Inc. (SSLX) and American Financial Holdings, Inc. (AFHJ). Each traded on the over-the-counter market and was quoted on the Pink Sheets. Fareri pleaded guilty to mail fraud and Harary pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud in parallel criminal actions brought the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.
This article was obtained on the SEC’s website.
AFHJ · American Financial Holdings Inc · Amerifinancial · Anthony Fareri · broker receiving kickbacks · broker theft from customers · elder abuse · elder abuse awareness · elder abuse in investments · Fareri Financial Services · FFS · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra securities arbitration · finra securities arbitration lawyer · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · fraud · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · investment fraud · manipulating stock price · Paul Harary · Penny stock fraud · Relief Defendant Anthony Fareri and Associates Inc · SEC · Secure Solutions Holdings Inc · Securities and Exchange Commission · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud lawyer · shell companies defrauding clients · Soreide Law Group PLLC · SSLX · stock broker fraud · Stock fraud lawyer · stock loss · stockbroker misconduct · targeting elderly investors · unauthorized trades
