Securities Fraud Blog | Find out if your broker is liable for your losses

TAG | insurance fraud lawyer

Jun/11

28

Did You Experience Significant Losses with Morgan Keegan?

Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA

Morgan Keegan Fund Losses*
Ticker Bond Fund 2007 2008
RMH RMK High Income Fund (-)58.0% (-)39.0%
RHY RMK Multi-Sector High Income Fund (-)60.6% (-)44.5%
RMA RMK Advantage Income Fund (-)56.9% (-)39.1%
RSF RMK Strategic Income Fund (-)58.1% (-)42.0%
RHICX RMK Select High Income-C (-)59.9% (-)45.9%
MKHIX RMK Select High Income-A (-)59.7% (-)46.1%
RHIIX RMK Select High Income-I (-)59.6% (-)46.0%
RIBCX RMK Select Intermediate Bond Fund-C (-)50.6% (-)66.6%
MKIBX RMK Select Intermediate Bond Fund-A (-)50.3% (-)66.5%
RIBIX RMK Select Intermediate Bond Fund-I (-)50.1% (-)66.5%
*Information accurate as of July 1, 2008 (4:25 CST) c/o Morningstar.

Soreide Law Group, PLLC, is currently investigating, for several clients, Morgan Keegan fund losses.

Morgan Keegan allegedly marketed the funds as safe investments that were suitable for low-risk investors. When the housing market crashed in 2007, the funds fell in value. Investors meanwhile experienced huge financial losses.

Many lawsuits and arbitration claims have been filed against Morgan Keegan, as well as against several of the company’s top executives. Evidence has continued to back up investors’ claims that the Memphis-based brokerage allegedly misled clients when it marketed and sold the bond funds.

Additional charges came in April, 2010, when the Securities and Exchange Commission, (SEC) state regulators and FINRA charged Morgan Keegan and two employees – James Kelsoe and Joe Weller – with fraud for inflating the value of the risky securities held by the bond funds.

If you or a loved one have lost money in an RMK bond fund, call Soreide Law Group, PLLC at (888) 760-6552 and speak to a FINRA Arbitration Lawyer free of charge to discuss how you could potentially recover your losses, or visit http://www.stockmarketlawsuit.com.

 

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Jun/11

25

Life Insurance Sold to Church Members Alleged Scam by Agents

Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA

In a June 17, 2011, article written by Darla Mercado for InvestmentNews.com, she writes that six life insurance agents claim that Aviva Life and Annuity Co. had consented to the offer of insurance coverage to some 119 churchgoers in Los Angeles.

It was reported that insurance agents, Kazimir Patelski, Glenda Smith-Lee, Napoleon B. Kinney, Cheralynne Bridgewater, Candice H. Hobdy and Rene Williams responded to a lawsuit filed by the insurer in U.S. District Court in the Central District of California.

Mercado writes that originally, Aviva had sued the agents in March, claiming that the six had sold life insurance to the church parishioners in 2009 and 2010 under false pretenses. Wilshire Coast Consultants Inc., a named defendant, was trustee over 119 irrevocable life insurance trusts, each one holding an Aviva policy on the life of a churchgoer, according to the suit.

The carrier alleged that the parishioners were solicited at church for an “endowment program,” which involved taking out a policy on a church member and dividing the death benefits between that person’s beneficiaries, the church and an unknown third party. Aviva claimed that some parishioners who contacted the insurer said they either never paid premiums on the policy or that they paid only the initial premium and another entity made subsequent payments. Indeed, two churchgoers contacted by InvestmentNews in April had claimed that the program was offered as a way to help their church.

InvestmentNews.com reports that in the latest chapter of the litigation, the agents have turned the table, claiming that Aviva is guilty of “unclean hands” and had consented to the very acts it accuses the insurance agents of participating in.

“Plaintiff directed, ordered, approved, and in all other respects, ratified the acts and performance of these answering defendants,” the agents claim in their response. The insurer had “consented to the acts and omissions alleged in the complaint.”

The defendants specifically denied perpetrating a “Choli” or charity-owned life insurance scheme involving the provision of fraudulent marketing tactics, undisclosed premium finance payments and other financial incentives. Choli is a variation of stranger-owned life insurance (Stoli). The agents also denied Aviva’s allegation that the insurer’s producer guidelines don’t permit policy sales to be sold in the manner the agents had used.

The InvestmentNews.com article said that Mr. Patelski and the other defendants acknowledge that people who apply for coverage from Aviva need to answer questions about whether anyone other than the insured will pay for the premiums or whether the insured intends to transfer the policy to another party. However, the defendants denied the allegations, claiming they lacked the sufficient knowledge to determine the veracity of the accusations.

“We are fortunate this issue was discovered early before any claims were made on any of the policies,” Aviva spokesman Steve Carlson said. “Multiple misrepresentations were made to Aviva as part of these transactions.”

If you feel you’ve been allegedly defrauded by any of the above agents who sold life insurance policies through Aviva Life and Annuity Co. , contact Soreide Law Group.  For more information about our services please visit:  www.stockmarketlawsuit.com or call for a free consultation with an attorney at:  (888) 760-6552.

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Jun/11

16

Christian Genitrini Fined and Suspended by FINRA

Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA

 

Christian Genitrini (CRD #3277581, Registered Representative, New York, New York)

submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was fined $15,000,

suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for two years, and

required to requalify by exam for Series 7 and Series 63 before becoming re-associated

with a member firm after the expiration of the suspension term. The fine shall be paid in

installments beginning 90 days after Genitrini’s reassociation with a FINRA member firm

following his suspension, or prior to the filing of any application or request for relief from

any statutory disqualification, whichever is earlier. Without admitting or denying the

findings, Genitrini consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of findings that

he advertised guaranteed returns on investments of up to 20 percent per year on a website

belonging to a company he wholly owned; Genitrini claimed that his company was a fullservice

investment firm and would, among other claims, provide high-yield investment

opportunities. The findings stated that the website declared that the company invested

nationwide and all industries were considered, but did not disclose the nature of the

investment product or the risks of investment. The findings also stated that Genitrini’s ads

appeared on other websites guaranteeing returns, and his company’s contemplated private

placement documents provided no assurance that by following its current investment

strategy, it would be successful or profitable; the subscription agreement also stated that

the investments the company carried might be volatile and present operational risks.

The findings also included that Genitrini’s Internet ads constituted communications with

the public; were not based on principles of fair dealing and good faith; were not fair and

balanced; did not disclose risks associated with the investment; guaranteed promising

returns that were exaggerated, unwarranted or misleading; and the predictions of

performance were also exaggerated or unwarranted.

FINRA found that Genitrini’s private offering of securities, which involved promissory

notes his company issued according to the private placement memorandum, was not

made pursuant to an effective registration statement filed with the SEC; the offering

was intended to be made pursuant to the exemption from registration in Section 4(2)

of Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, which prohibits offers or sales

of securities by any form of general solicitation or general advertising. FINRA also found

that Genitrini’s use of the Internet and his company’s website violated Section 5 of the

Securities Act of 1933, and guaranteeing returns in the offer of securities over the Internet

violated Section 17(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, FINRA determined

that Genitrini falsely described his work with his company on his member firm’s outside

business activity disclosure form and also failed to disclose that he maintained a website

for the company; Genitrini told his firm, in writing, that his business and website were for

tax-planning services.

The suspension is in effect from April 4, 2011, through April 3, 2013.

 

(FINRA Case #2010022859701)

 This information was obtained on FINRA’s website under the May disciplanary actions.

 

If you feel you have been a victim of the alleged fraudulent schemes of Christian Genitrini, call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how to recover your losses.  To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA  the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Jun/11

7

David Lerner & Associates Charged By FINRA With Soliciting Investors to Purchase REITs Without Fully Investigating Suitability

Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA

WASHINGTON — On FINRA’s website, The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced May31,2011, that it has filed a complaint against David Lerner & Associates, Inc. (DLA), of Syosset, NY, charging the firm with soliciting investors to purchase shares in Apple REIT Ten, a non-traded $2 billion Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), without conducting a reasonable investigation to determine whether it was suitable for investors, and with providing misleading information on its website regarding Apple REIT Ten distributions. DLA has sold and continues to sell Apple REIT Ten targeting unsophisticated and elderly customers with unsuitable sales of the illiquid security.

FINRA’s complaint goes on to say that since January 2011, as sole underwriter for Apple REIT Ten, DLA has sold over $300 million of an open $2 billion offering of the REIT’s shares. Apple REIT Ten invests in the same extended stay hotel properties as a series of other Apple REITs closed to investors. Apple REIT Ten and the closed Apple REITs were founded by the same individual, and are all under common management. DLA has been the sole underwriter for Apple REITs since 1992, selling nearly $6.8 billion of the securities into approximately 122,600 DLA customer accounts. DLA earns 10 percent of all offerings of Apple REIT securities as well as other fees. Apple REIT sales have generated $600 million for DLA, accounting for 60 to 70 percent of DLA’s business annually since 1996.

 This complaint against David Lerner & Associates (DLA) alleges that since at least 2004, the closed Apple REITs have unreasonably valued their shares at a constant price of $11 notwithstanding market fluctuations, performance declines and increased leverage, while maintaining outsized distributions of 7 to 8 percent by leveraging the REITs through borrowings and returning capital to investors. As sole distributor, DLA did not question the Apple REITs’ unchanging valuations despite the economic downturn for commercial real estate.

 The FINRA article goes on to say that in its solicitation of customers to purchase Apple REIT Ten, DLA’s website provided distribution rates for all of the previous Apple REITs. These distribution figures were misleading and omitted material information because they did not disclose recent distribution rate reductions or that distributions far exceeded income from operations and were funded by debt that further leveraged the REITs.

 FINRA alleges that DLA failed to sufficiently investigate the valuation and distribution irregularities of the closed Apple REITs prior to selling Apple REIT Ten. As the sole underwriter of all of the Apple REITs, DLA was aware of the Apple REITs’ valuation and distribution practices. Rather than conduct due diligence into those valuations and distribution irregularities to determine that they were reasonable and that the Apple REITs were suitable, DLA accepted the valuations and continued to record them on customer account statements.

 This issuance of a disciplinary complaint represents the initiation of a formal proceeding by FINRA in which findings as to the allegations in the complaint have not been made, and does not represent a decision as to any of the allegations contained in the complaint. Under FINRA rules, a firm or individual named in a complaint can file a response and request a hearing before a FINRA disciplinary panel. Possible remedies include a fine, censure, suspension or bar from the securities industry, disgorgement of gains associated with the violations and payment of restitution.

This article was obtained on FINRA’s website.

If you or a family member have become a victim of the alleged fraudulent schemes of David Lerner Associates, Inc., call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how you could potentially recover you losses.  To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA  the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Jun/11

6

Broker-Dealers Often Keep Insurance Licenses After Being Fired

Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA

In an article from InvestmentNews.com, May 29, 2011, Bruce Kelly writes that Neal Smalbach was fired by a broker-dealer in 2008 for selling securities while he was unregistered, an infraction that got him suspended by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. (FINRA) for six months, according to the organization’s BrokerCheck system. It was the second time that a securities firm had let him go. Though he no longer had a securities license, Mr. Smalbach still had a license to sell insurance, and made good use of it — at least for himself, authorities said.

Kelly writes that on April 29, Mr. Smalbach was arrested in Florida by the Pinellas County sheriff and charged with one count of insurance fraud and one count of organized fraud. Each count carries a maximum of five years in prison, along with a potential $5,000 fine. The charges of insurance fraud against Mr. Smalbach, who also has 37 pending customer disputes from his time as a broker, according to BrokerCheck, highlight a persistent problem in the investment advice business:

Registered representatives who permanently or temporarily lose their license to sell stocks, bonds and mutual funds often retain a license to sell insurance.

Although state agencies that regulate insurance agents and securities brokers try to work together to keep an eye on brokers who get fired from either side of the industry, regulators are sometimes limited in their authority because of a lack of information sharing about reps and agents, observers said.

A common criticism among registered reps is that insurance agents who lose a license to sell securities products often sell equity-indexed annuities, an insurance product that is nonetheless marketed as an investment that can compete with a mutual fund or variable annuity.

“It’s been an issue, and still is, among states,” said Joseph Borg, director of the Alabama Securities Commission. “If you’ve been kicked out of one end of the financial markets, you probably don’t need to be in another.”

According to the InvestmentNews.com article, Mr. Smalbach, 48, was selling mortgage insurance policies that promise to pay the balance of a policyholder’s mortgage in the event that he or she dies, according to Jeremy Powers, an assistant state attorney in Florida’s Fifth Judicial Circuit. But instead of mortgage insurance, Mr. Smalbach’s clients were, in fact, sold whole-life policies that were worth no more than $20,000.

“Somebody who’s had the level of problems that [Mr.] Smalbach appears to have had would create a risk for consumers,” Mr. Powers said. “The activities alleged in this case are pretty serious and had the potential to create multiple hundreds of thousands of dollars in victim losses.”

 Smalbach, whose sales practices were profiled last month by the St. Petersburg (Fla.) Times, serve as a backdrop to efforts by lawmakers in Washington and regulators across the country to create a single fiduciary standard for investment advisers, registered reps and insurance agents. This year, a law went into effect in Florida that gives the state’s Department of Financial Services the power to revoke an insurance agent’s license immediately if the agent has his or her securities license revoked.

“Fraud is fraud,” said Nina Ashley, a department spokeswoman.

Kelly reminds us that when confronted with a broker whose securities license had been pulled — but who maintained an insurance license — regulators’ hands are, at times, tied. To take actions against a broker’s insurance license, Ms. Ashley said a specific insurance violation has to be found. “That didn’t always exist,” she said.

Florida already has used the new law to revoke the insurance license of a broker who misrepresented information when selling securities to a senior citizen, Ms. Ashley said. In February, the Florida Office of Financial Regulation permanently barred Jeffrey Donner on charges that he failed to disclose to clients that their accounts would automatically be billed advisory fees of 30% annualized, according to a statement from the agency. Approximately $40,000 in management fees were deducted from clients’ accounts. While Mr. Donner neither admitted nor denied the findings, Florida regulators revoked his insurance license this month according to the InvestmentNews.com article.

THEY ARE FINDING LOOPHOLES

We’ve learned that Mr. Smalbach, however, still has a license to sell insurance products such as life and health policies, and variable annuities, according to the Florida Department of Financial Services’ website.

The broker in question exploited another loophole in the law when he sold stock in a firm called Transfer Technology International Corp., whose shares are currently listed at less than a penny a share. At least a dozen elderly investors, some in their 80s and 90s, bought nearly $1 million of the stock from Mr. Smalbach, according to the St. Petersburg Times. Although he didn’t have a securities license, Mr. Smalbach was an employee of Transfer Technology and could sell shares in the company to accredited investors legally, the newspaper reported.

THEY ARE SMOOTH OPERATORS

Bruce Kelly writes that one longtime client of Mr. Smalbach who invested in the Wesley Chapel, Fla.-based company was Bob Fox, 78, of Sebring, Fla. A client of Mr. Smalbach’s for over a decade, Mr. Fox said he has lost $100,000 in his Transfer Technology investment.

“He was a really smooth talker,” Mr. Fox said, adding that Mr. Smalbach often hurried him through paperwork when buying an investment.

Mr. Smalbach’s former accountant, Robert Ferreira, corroborated Mr. Fox’s statement said the ex-broker often rushed clients through the process of buying investment products, including variable annuities.

“His method was to say, “Sign here, fill in this and that — I’m in a hurry and will fill in the rest at the office,’” Mr. Ferreira said.

If you or a family member have purchased policies through Neal Smalbach or other brokers and experienced a similar situation, contact an insurance fraud attorney for a free consultation on how to potentially recover your investment losses.  To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit stockmarketlawsuit.com. 

We stand up and fight for the rights of consumers. Soreide Law Group, PLLC, representing Insurance Fraud Victims in Federal Court, State Court and before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”).

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Jun/11

5

Finra files complaint against David Lerner Associates For REIT Sales to Elderly

Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA

In a June, 2011, article from Bloomberg News, it was written that David Lerner Associates Inc. has been accused of targeting unsophisticated and elderly customers while selling real estate investment trust (REITs) shares without considering whether the illiquid security was suitable for its clients.

David Lerner Associates is based in Syosset, New York, and known for its “Take a tip from Poppy” advertising slogan, misled investors who bought more than $300 million of shares in the $2 billion Apple REIT Ten offering this year, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority(FINRA) said in a disciplinary complaint on its website. The firm denies the allegations, according to a statement.

It was reported in the Bloomberg News article that David Lerner Associates solicited customers for Apple REIT Ten, it provided misleading information about distribution rates for a series of predecessor securities that are now closed to investors, Finra said. The figures failed to show that distributions far exceeded income and were funded by debt that increased leverage in the REITs, which invest in extended-stay hotels, the regulator said.  David Lerner Associates has sold almost $6.8 billion of Apple REIT shares to more than 122,000 customers since 1992, according to the Finra complaint, the industry-funded regulator for U.S. brokerages. Those sales have generated more than $600 million, accounting for more than 60 percent of the firm’s business since 1996, Finra said.

This complaint is the first step in a formal proceeding, Finra said. It isn’t filed in court, and the firm can request a hearing before a disciplinary panel, the regulator said in its statement.

“The firm conducted thorough due diligence of Apple REIT Ten’s offering documents and audited financial statements,” DLA said in its statement. “DLA will vigorously defend these claims. It looks forward to the opportunity to set the record straight and expects to be completely vindicated.”

Also, in the Bloomberg News article it was stated that in September, DLA paid a $255,000 fine for failing to provide required information in connection with the replacement of variable life insurance policies and annuity contracts from November 1998 through February 2004, according to the New York State Insurance Department. A year ago this month, DLA was accused by Finra of overcharging customers on sales of municipal bonds and mortgage securities. That case is still pending, according to Finra’s brokerage records.

If you or a family member have become a victim of the alleged fraudulent schemes of David Lerner Associates, Inc., call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how you could potentially recover you losses.  To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA  the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

May/11

25

John Hancock to Pay $1 millon to State of Louisiana in Death Benefit Fallout

Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA

In an InvestmentNews.com article by Darla Mercado, May 24, 2011, it was reported that the State of Louisiana will collect about $1 million in a settlement with John Hancock Life Insurance Co. as part of a massive investigation into the insurer’s payment of death benefits. This agreement will go into effect next month, according to an announcement from Louisiana’s Treasury Department. Some 35 states are also participating in the settlement with the insurer.

This is the third such announcement for John Hancock, which last week reached a settlement with Florida that included a $3 million payment to three Florida regulatory agencies. They also agreed to return funds to beneficiaries and to establish a $10 million fund to facilitate payments to beneficiaries who can’t be contacted. In April, John Hancock reached a settlement with California valued at $20 million.

In the InvestmentNew.com article it was reported that an audit into John Hancock revealed that the insurer failed to report unclaimed life insurance benefits properly, according to Louisiana’s Treasury Department.

“In many cases, those who were owed benefits because of the death of a loved one were never even notified,” said Louisiana’s treasurer, John Kennedy. “We will do everything we can to find these families and return the money that rightfully belongs to them.”

Mercado reports that the announcement happens to fall on the same day that regulators in California are holding a hearing with MetLife Inc. executives. State officials plan to question the execs about the carrier’s use of the Social Security Administration’s master death list, as well as its process for notifying beneficiaries who are owed money.

If you or a family member have become alleged victims of non-payment of death benefits through John Hancock Life Insurance Co, or MetLife, or any other life insurance company, contact an insurance fraud attorney for a free consultation on how to recover your investment losses.  To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit stockmarketlawsuit.com. 

We stand up and fight for the rights of consumers. Soreide Law Group, PLLC, representing Insurance Fraud Victims in Federal Court, State Court and before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”).

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

May/11

19

Lawyer Pleads Guilty in Major Insurance Fraud Case

Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA

In a May 18th., 2011 article in the Miami Herald,  Jay Weaver reports that a prominent attorney whose fortune rose with a Fort Lauderdale viatical insurance company at the center of a $1.25 billion investment fraud case pleaded guilty Wednesday to a single conspiracy charge, marking a major development in the long-running prosecution of executives and others at Mutual Benefits Corp.

Fort Lauderdale attorney Michael McNerney, 62, admitted that as its lawyer, he helped the now-defunct company lure thousands of investors worldwide into buying dubious life insurance policies held mostly in the names of people dying of AIDS.

Weaver goes on to say that McNerney’s role was part of an alleged investment scam lasting from 1995 to 2004 that authorities say rivals the $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme of disbarred Fort Lauderdale lawyer Scott Rothstein, convicted last year of selling fabricated legal settlements in a separate criminal case. The Mutual Benefits and Rothstein cases rank as Florida’s largest fraud prosecutions.

The McNerney guilty plea to mail-and-wire fraud conspiracy, which carries up to five years in prison, marks the 10th person to be convicted in the Mutual Benefits prosecution in Miami federal court. He will be sentenced Aug. 26 before U.S. District Judge Adalberto Jordan. With his plea, McNerney avoided a potential sentence of up to 20 years. As part of his deal, McNerney will cooperate with prosecutors on how the alleged life settlement racket was directed by Mutual Benefit’s senior executives

The Miami Hearld reports that the two top executives of the company, Joel Steinger and brother Steven Steiner, along with another Fort Lauderdale lawyer Anthony Livoti, are scheduled to stand trial in early 2013 — but that date could be moved up with McNerney’s plea. He was scheduled to go to trial by himself early next year. Steinger and Steiner were planning on using a defense based on their reliance on McNerney’s legal counsel for all their business decisions regarding Mutual Benefits’ sale of some 30,000 viatical insurance policies to investors who lost about $837 million. But that defense may be in danger now that he has pleaded guilty to being a player in the alleged conspiracy.

It was reported that McNerney, a 1973 graduate of the University of Florida College of Law, admitted that he not only encouraged investors to buy the questionable viatical policies, but he also provided “legal cover” for Steinger and others to perpetuate the alleged fraud, according to a “factual statement” filed with his plea agreement.

Wednesday, McNerney confessed that he schemed with other executives at Mutual Benefits by misleading investors about the life expectancy of insured beneficiaries; the use of funds raised from investors; the risks associated with the investments in viatical settlements; and the payments of insurance premiums on those policies.

“This is a major breakthrough in the prosecution’s case because it shows the defendants were not relying on the advice of an independent attorney,” said Ryan O’Quinn, a former federal prosecutor and Securities and Exchange Commission attorney, who had been involved in the case since 2004. “It shows Michael McNerney was a knowing participant in the fraud, standing side by side with the co-defendants.”

The Herald article goes on to say that in January 2009, the U.S. attorney’s office unsealed the sweeping 25-count fraud indictment against Steinger, identified as Mutual Benefits’ principal executive, brother Steiner, the company’s founder, as well as McNerney and Livoti. The indictment, alleging a conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering, was filed nearly five years after state and federal regulators shut down Mutual Benefits. The company was placed in receivership.

The company, Mutual Benefits, bought life insurance policies of AIDS patients and the elderly and sold the policies to investors, who stood to collect benefits when the insured died. Mutual Benefits promised investors the investments were “safe.” But prosecutors alleged Steinger hired doctors to attest to life expectancies for the insured. By claiming the beneficiaries were near death, prosecutors alleged, Mutual Benefits could sell low-value policies at a higher price. But the longer the insured lived, the more premium payments had to be made to prevent the policy from lapsing and becoming worthless.

According to Jay Weaver of the Miami Herald, prosecutors further alleged that Mutual Benefits was a massive Ponzi scheme, using money from newer investors to pay premium obligations on older policies.

If you or a family member have purchased policies through Mutual Benefits, Corp, or other viatical companies, and become the victim of the life-expectancy predicitons, contact an insurance fraud attorney for a free consultation on how to recover your investment losses.  To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit stockmarketlawsuit.com. 

We stand up and fight for the rights of consumers. Soreide Law Group, PLLC, representing Insurance Fraud Victims in Federal Court, State Court and before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”).

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

May/11

6

Florida and California Insurers’ Death Benefit Payout Practices Targeted

Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA

In an April 26th, 2011, article from InvestmentNews.com, Darla Mercado writes that attorneys have set their sights on life insurers as state regulators investigate the carriers for their failure to pay out death benefits or submit the money to the state in a timely fashion, allegedly while still collecting fees in some cases, and leading the way is California’s controller and insurance regulator, which announced jointly a subpoena and investigative hearing of MetLife Inc.’s practices on paying death benefits.

Ms. Mercado goes on to say that the preliminary findings from a three-year audit by the state revealed that for 20 years, the carrier failed to pay benefits to named beneficiaries or the state after learning that a customer had died. MetLife’s hearing has been set for May 23. That same audit, which covered 21 life insurers, led to a settlement between John Hancock Financial Services Inc. and California on Friday. That day, Florida’s Office of Insurance Regulation announced a May 19 hearing on the same topic. That office also had subpoenaed MetLife and Nationwide Life Insurance Co., asking that the companies bring representatives to discuss the carriers’ practices.

The regulatory activity has garnered the attention of plaintiff’s attorneys, who are watching the drama unfold and expect some litigation fallout as a result. According to the InvestmentNews.com article, the key legal question is what exactly were the insurer’s responsibilities in performing the due diligence to find the beneficiaries. Carriers use the Social Security Administration’s death master list database for reference.

The beneficiaries of these policies are supposed to submit a claim for the death benefits, but if a carrier doesn’t hear from a beneficiary and has information on hand to show that an insured person has died, then at what point does the company escheat the money to the state?

It was noted that aside from following regulatory and statutory requirements, the insurer used its electronic death master file in 2006 and 2007 to identify individual life insurance policies for which a death benefit was due but no claim had been filed to date. The carrier will expand its use of the electronic death master file to identify potentially payable policies this year.

Depending on applicable state law, when beneficaries can’t be located within 3 to 5 years after the company receives notice of a death, the policy proceeds are considered unclaimed and go to the appropriate state. MetLife escheated $51 million to the states in 2010.

If you or a family member have become victims of this alleged fraud, contact an insurance fraud attorney for a free consultation on how to recover your investment losses.  To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. 
We stand up and fight for the rights of consumers. Representing Insurance Fraud Victims in Federal Court, State Court and before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”).

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

May/11

2

Timothy J. Roth Accused of Stealing $6Mill from Clients Mutual Fund Shares

Comments off · Posted by admin in FINRA

It was announced 0n March 21, 2011, on the SEC’s website that the SEC obtained an emergency court order freezing the assets of Urbana, Illinois money manager Timothy J. Roth for stealing more than $6 million of his clients’ mutual fund shares, liquidating the shares, and sending the ill-gotten gains to various accounts and companies under his control. The Court also entered a temporary restraining order prohibiting Roth from violating the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws.

According to the SEC article, there was a civil complaint filed by the SEC. Roth worked for Comprehensive Capital Management, Inc. (“CCM”), a New Jersey-based registered investment adviser. The SEC’s complaint alleges that from October 2010 through February 2011, Roth stole more than $6 million worth of mutual fund shares from several employee deferred compensation plans for whom he provided investment advice.

The SEC complaint alleges that Roth, who worked out of CCM’s office near Urbana, Illinois, secretly caused the Plans’ mutual fund shares to be transferred to an account under his control, even though no such transfer had been requested or authorized by the Plans or the Plans’ participants. The SEC alleges that after selling the Plans’ shares, Roth funneled the cash proceeds to various accounts and companies under his control or for his benefit. According to the SEC’s complaint, at the time he was engaging in his scheme, Roth did not tell the Plans or their participants about the transfers. Instead, Roth sent them bogus account statements that deliberately omitted his surreptitious transfer of the mutual fund shares. Thus, the account statements overstated the Plans’ account holdings and concealed Roth’s theft.

In the SEC article they go on to say that the SEC’s complaint charges Roth with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and with aiding and abetting violations of Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-2 thereunder. In addition to the emergency relief already obtained, the complaint seeks preliminary and permanent injunctions, disgorgement, and civil penalties from Roth. The SEC’s complaint also names Roth’s companies as relief defendants and seeks disgorgement from them. The Court’s freeze order extends to the assets of the relief defendants. A hearing on the SEC’s motion for preliminary injunction has been set for 1:00 p.m. on March 30, 2011, at the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois courthouse in Peoria, Illinois before Judge Michael M. Mihm.

This article was obtained on the SEC’s website.

If you or a family member have become an alleged victim of Timothy J. Roth of Comprehensive Capital Mangement, Inc., CCM , call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how to recover your investment losses.  To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com.  Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA  the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·

Older posts >>

Find it!

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me
To top