TAG | broker forging signature
Susan Mae Karn (CRD #5218398, Registered Representative, Wimbledon, North Dakota)
submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which she was fined $5,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for six months. The fine must be paid either immediately upon Karn’s reassociation with a FINRA member firm following her suspension, or prior to the filing of any application or request for relief from any statutory disqualification, whichever is earlier. Without admitting or denying the findings, Karn consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of findings that she allowed a customer to sign relatives’ names on life insurance applications, and before Karn submitted them for processing, she signed the insurance applications and certified that she had witnessed each of the proposed signatures on the insurance applications. The findings stated that Karn falsely certified on the Representative’s Information Supplement document for each insurance application that she had personally seen each proposed insured at the time the application was completed. The findings also stated that one of Karn’s clients completed an application to purchase a municipal bond fund by signing her name on an electronic signature pad, and later that same day, Karn signed the client’s name on the electronic signature pad and thereby affixed the client’s signature on an application without the client’s authorization, consent or knowledge.
The FINRA findings also included that the application Karn’s member firm processed and sent to the client reflected the signature Karn had affixed rather than the client’s authentic signature. FINRA found that when the firm questioned Karn about the authenticity of the client’s signature, Karn initially stated it was the client’s original signature, but when questioned further, admitted she had signed the client’s name and in doing so, Karn misled her firm during its internal investigation into a customer complaint.
The suspension is in effect from March 7, 2011, through September 6, 2011. (FINRA Case #2010022067901)
This information was obtained on FINRA’s website.
If you or a family member have become victims of the alleged fraudulent schemes of Susan Mae Karn, or have experienced a similar situation, call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how you could potentially recover you losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com.
Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
broker forging signature · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · FINRA arbitration · finra lawyer · finra securities arbitration lawyer · florida insurance fraud lawyer · florida life insurance fraud · forging life insurance applications · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · insurance fraud · insurance fraud life policy · insurance scam by stockbrokers · investment fraud · life insurance fraud lawyer · life insurance lawyer · life insurance policy · Purchase life insurance policies · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · stock broker fraud · stock loss · stockbroker forging documents · stockbroker misconduct · Susan Karn · Susan Mae Karn · targeting elderly investors
submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was fined $10,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for one year. The fine must be paid either immediately upon Miller’s reassociation with a FINRA member firm following his suspension, or prior to the filing of any application or request for relief from any statutory disqualification, whichever is earlier. Without admitting or denying the findings, Miller consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of findings that he and another individual were trainees in a member firm’s professional development program and formed a partnership through which they jointly solicited and handled customer accounts as well as splitting any production credits that either generated. The findings stated that as part of their efforts to attract clients, Miller and the individual created a spreadsheet that set a model fund portfolio that they either presented to potential customers during meetings or sent by email or mail to prospective customers. The findings also stated that Miller and the individual sent a version of their model fund portfolio that included a mix of conservative and risky securities along with a chart of history of returns the individual securities and overall portfolio earned; Miller and the individual, in some communications with potential customers, misrepresented that this was a portfolio that they managed and that the stated returns were their returns. The findings also included that neither Miller nor the individual sought or received a firm supervisor’s prior approval for the use of the model fund portfolio or permission of its dissemination, nor was the model portfolio’s spreadsheet filed with FINRA’s Advertising Regulation Department, within 10 business days after first dissemination of the material as required.
FINRA found that the model fund portfolios did not include any information regarding the risks associated with the funds, and the chart did not include a sound basis for the performance evaluation for each of the securities included in the portfolio. FINRA also found that the model portfolio failed to identify or to display in a prominent fashion Miller’s and the other individual’s association with their firm. In addition, FINRA determined that Miller had his assistant type up a stop transfer letter and he forged the customer’s signature on the letter meant to prevent the customer from transferring his account to another firm. Moreover, FINRA found that Miller admitted to his branch manager that he had forged the stop transfer request and the firm immediately terminated Miller’s employment.
This information was obtained on FINRA’s website.
If you feel you have been a victim of these alleged fraudulent schemes of Stuart Phillip Miller, call a Securities Arbitration Lawyer for a free consultation on how to recover your losses. To speak with an attorney, call 888-760-6552, or visit www.stockmarketlawsuit.com. Soreide Law Group, PLLC., representing investors nationwide before FINRA the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
broker forging signature · broker misrepresenting funds · broker recommending risky investments · broker transfering account to another firm without permission · elder abuse in investments · failure to file advertising with FINRA · Financial Industry Regulatory Authority · FINRA · finra lawyer · fort lauderdale securities fraud lawyer · fort lauderdale securities lawyer · Ft. Lauderdale Securities Lawyer · high risk trading · investment fraud · mutual fund · portfolio model scam · risky securities · securities arbitraton lawyer · securities fraud lawyer · Soreide Law Group PLLC · Stock fraud lawyer · stock loss · stockbroker forging documents · stockbroker misconduct · stockbroker phoney portfolio · Stuart Miller · Stuart Phillip Miller · targeting elderly investors · unauthorized trades
